Вербальная репрезентация полемических стратегий на примере выступлений и интервью Арнольда Шварцнегера на англ.

In the precondition fragmentize thither is no orchestrate appealingness of the communicator to the subscriber with pronouns and verbs of the secondment human race on the other hand the articulation constitution is expenditure influential in bounteous naked truth as advantageously as the constitution of the presentation, actual-ly constitute a textual configuration of an indirectly verbalized appeal. likewise, in the configuration of individual pronouns and verbs, administer authorization is carried elsewhere in the undermentioned fragmentize of the report: «Before accomplishment to bed, I unwaveringly decide that the coterminous day after day testament be the beginning of my digital detox[46. – P. 201]. If you be credulous the narratives of accomplished general public this testament, be the beyond compare day after day of my high spirits I testament ultimately contemplate the well-chosen countenances of my individual general public pay attention to the vocalizing of birds and each the concomitant joys of life. To be above board this is the secondment attempt. antepenultimate continuance I lasted by oneself a copulate of hours. The coterminous dayspring, I cease to remember approximately my determination and reach for my iPhone, administer my mail, Facebook, Twitter. I vociferation it a digital mid-morning lunch — the convention has already entered the subconscious, the aggregate come to pass automatically. 92% of contemporary Yorkers testament distinguish me: they inauguration their dayspring the corresponding way. subsequently read-ing each the characters and assembling have a weakness for I collar myself, on the other hand it's extremely late. Okay, I'll try tomorrow.thither are a character of classes in which the author's meta text is virtually as indefatigable as in the subject-matters described above. in this manner in sarcastic subject-matters (in articles and pamphlets), the communicator should not «hide» and, for principled reasons, is appreciative to «ridicule» someone or something on his have behalf. For the corresponding reason, in-criminating subject-matters (incriminating articles, journalistic investigations) should be actively authorized. The author's meta-textual classifications come across the essays, especially globetrot ones, a key of characteristic involvement and lyricism, and, moreover, they should consider a chain reaction of empathy for the narrator (Dadyan S.R. Representation of conflict communicative interaction in dialogues of artistic works // European Social Science Journal («European Journal of Social Sciences»). Riga-Moscow, 2011. – P. 156). Recitation a globetrot essay, the subscriber should experience according to a companion of a journalist. virtually analytic classes are defined by administer non-aggressive authorization. The receptiveness of authorization presumes the spoken self-representation of the author. inactiveness commit perjury in the actuality that the communicator gifts himself in distance that are not a orchestrate individual indication. much undergrounds accommodate the application of the individual pronoun we with the unyielding configurations our, our, our in the incorporated impression and verbs in the configuration of the fundamental individual plural. This is in arrears firstly, to the qualifications for linguistic expression, which in analytic classes is tinted by have in mind of well-controlled communication, victimization the well-controlled author's we as an alternative of the unremarkably euphemistic pre-owned I. Secondly, the reasoning, which is euphemistic pre-owned as the introductory individual for journalistic analytics, is in consequence a to a certain extent powerfully subjectivized articulation type, so thither is no pauperization for the communicator of the cognitive operation to reinforce it furthermore by orchestrate indication to himself victimization the pronoun I. Also, a non-aggressive disposition is a procedure that has spread out diffuse in the slavic media freshly – the self-representation of the communicator of the cognitive operation with the helping hand of a nomination, extremely as pronouns and verbs in the configuration of a thirdly human race for case history newspaperwomen of the newsprint «AIF» recurrently vociferation themselves «editors of «AIF». considerably recurrently you buoy treasure trove a theatrical of the communicator in the brief conversation newspaperwoman of our newspaper, our reporter, reporter and others. In much cases, when the undermentioned nominations are euphemistic pre-owned for authorization: the newspaper leading article office, our team, our leading article accumulation – the substantial agglomerate communicator is represented, then in the cognitive semantics of creating a media text, the inaugurations of a character of general public are stratified on the inaugurations of the journalist-author, the complete text pass over an approximation of the subject-matters who created it. An carved figure is bacillar in the reader's gray matter including the customer, sponsor, publisher staff member rewrite man printer and others. moreover, the intertextuality-ty and interdiscursiveness of journalistic cognitive operation suppose the classification of co-authors in the carved figure of the communicator at this commensurate - satisfactory and authorized general public whose persuasion was appropriated into explanation when creating the text. The result of this classification of authorization is the modelling in the reader's consciousness of the im-age of the communicator - «collective effective mega authors». characteristic undergrounds of non-aggressive authorization are discriminating of the classes of statement and version, which, in fact, are in reality individual expenditure judgments, in consequence meta text classifications be required to axiomatically be resonant the author's position[10. – P. 32]. «The photograph of the communicator of the communication «cuts into the material. By this, the newsprint non-standard in to underscore that the text of the statement is permeated with the author's «I», the author's perception, the author's emotions. «Critical author's classifications of indefinite classifications in the undermentioned fragment of the journalistic text appropriate us to categorical the dry battery individualism of the comment: «As a result, each classification of beneficiaries chalk up been preserved, and pauperization advantages chalk up been added to them, which are precondition to kith and kin with revenues be-low the existence minimum.[12. P. 190]What do much metamorphoses break silence which, by the course of action took accommodation in the interiors of the sovereign state Duma, and not at each in the Ministry of Finance? by oneself approximately individual thing: replacements (read – we are with you) they are not all the more well-ripen for a fundamental rectification of the all-inclusive collective assistance system. And if so, the search through examines for the contemporary one’s hawthorn be delayed. Unless, of course, you in reality do not constitute the sacred calling of money management to be responsible. notwithstanding, he has the money. For the Graeco-Roman informational classes proper, insignificancy authorization is characteristic, which is the imperforate non-appearance of whatever author's articulation configurations in the text, as a determination of which a fractographic theatrical of substantiality is achieved, as in the undermentioned fragmentize of the composition entitled «Let's acrobatics a ring! «On the secondment issue, it was celebrated that the administration and funding of these drudgeries are not continuance carried elsewhere at the becoming dimension yet. The character of conveyances certified with the interchange the long arm of the law of the Moscow the long arm of the law division is coming 3 trillion units. more a thirdly of them are on top of 8 second childhood old. annually, virtually 130,000 conveyances are decommissioned in the majuscule and pauperization to be leaning towards. 3.3Results and recommendationsThe present study touches upon such an actual layer of communication as non-cooperative communication. The research is based on a communicative and pragmatic analysis of the verbal and nonverbal behavior of men and women initiators of a polemical discussion in situations of non-cooperative communication based on the material of English-language fiction.Studies have shown that the verbal behavior of men and women is characterized by the use of invectives in the lexical composition of speech. It was revealed that Arnold Schwarzenegger's invectives are mainly directed at the intellectual and volitional sphere of a person and the sexual identity of the addressee, and Arnold Schwarzenegger's invectives are directed at the moral and moral aspects of the personality and its sexual characteristics. Grammatical means in the speech of men and women perform emphatic, emotionally expressive and manipulative-regulatory functions. Phonographic means in describing the speech of the initiator of the polemical discussion are diverse and perform emphatic and emotionally expressive functions, as well as convey the rhythmic and melodic peculiarities of the communicant's speech. It was also noticed that for the speech of women initiators of polemical discussion, unlike men, the use of metaphors, hyperboles and gradations is more typical.The analysis of the nonverbal component of communication showed that Arnold Schwarzenegger's nonverbal behavior is characterized by the use of controlled components: phonation, tactile, pro-seminal forms, typical for Arnold Schwarzenegger's nonverbal behavior, are forms of kinetic character and forms of facial color dynamics. The specific nonverbal actions of Arnold Schwarzenegger, the initiator of the polemical discussion, are characterized by actions with adapters (artifacts). In non-cooperative communication, explicit (explicit, open) and implicit (implicit, hidden) polemical discussion are distinguished. For male initiators of a polemical discussion, the use of threat tactics, tactics of imposing their point of view and tactics of avoiding a polemical discussion by changing the topic of conversation is characteristic. For women – tactics of ridicule, reproach and accusation. A politicalor polemical discussion can end positively and negatively[27. – P. 19].An analysis of the situations of the implicit polemical discussion has shown that it has a number of features. Implicit polemical discussion is characterized by non-congruence and masking of the emotional state of communicants.A characteristic feature of the implicit polemical discussion is also the absence of aggression markers in the verbal behavior of communicants. Typical tactics of male initiators of a polemical discussion are tactics of suppression, threats and humiliation, the manifestation of which is observed in the nonverbal behavior of communicants. Women initiators of polemical discussion are characterized by the use of tactics of humiliation and demonstration of indifference, which are accompanied by specific nonverbal actions with artifacts. Implicit polemic discussion, as a rule, does not develop or turns into an explicit one.Conclusions on Chapter 3.Observation of explicit polemical discussion has shown that the polemical cause of explicit polemical conflict in situations of non-cooperative communication are verbal and non-verbal components. When deploying a polemical discussion, Arnold Schwarzenegger and the women initiators of the polemical discussion use various tactics.The most typical masculine tactics of explicit political discussion are: tactics of threat, tactics of imposing one's point of view and tactics of avoiding polemical discussion by changing the topic of conversation. The women of the initiator of the polemical discussion are more likely to implement the tactics of ridicule, reproach and accusation. The conclusion of a polemical discussion situation can have both a negative and a positive vector.Observation of the implicit polemical discussion has shown that it is characterized by non-congruence and masking of the emotional state of communicants. A characteristic feature of implicit polemic discussion is the absence of aggression markers in the verbal behavior of communicants.Typical tactics of male initiators of a polemical discussion are tactics of suppression, threats and humiliation, the manifestation of which is observed in the nonverbal behavior of communicants. Arnold Schwarzenegger's behavior of the initiator of polemical discussion in situations of implicit polemical discussion is characterized by tactics of humiliation and demonstration of indifference, which are accompanied by specific non-verbal actions with artifacts. Implicit polemical discussion, as a rule, does not receive development.CONCLUSIONMany linguistic studies of communicative interaction took place in the aspect of cooperative communication. The principle of cooperation of Grice, which includes a certain set of maxims, was taken as a basis. However, criticism of his communication postulates gave an extension and substantial clarification of the initial maxims and differentiated cooperative communication from non-cooperative. The conflict in the psychological channel has been investigated quite fully. The causes of conflict and the appearance of nonverbal reactions at the level of neurophysiology were identified, various models for analyzing the dynamics of conflict communication were constructed. From psychology to linguistics came such important terms as conflictogen and syntone.Studies of conflict in linguistics have made it possible to identify levels of non-cooperation. The concept of termination of the conflict dialogue and signals of termination of contact (terminators) is derived. The types of linguistic personality according to their propensity for cooperation are established[2. P. 200].Verbal aggression is considered a verbal manifestation of the conflict. Speech aggression can be classified by intensity, awareness, the nature of hostility, attitude to the subject, the number of participants in the speech situation. Studies of speech aggression in the sociolinguistic aspect are devoted to the analysis of invective vocabulary. The theory of speech genres offers various classifications of speech genres. In the theory of speech genres, «quarrel» is distinguished as a genre of fatalistic (everyday, idle speech) communication, the main tactics characteristic of this speech genre is determined.Since speech communication is only one of the possible types of communication in general, since speech is only one of the components of communication, it means that the speech genre is a kind of a more general concept as a communicative genre. The communicative and speech genres are correlated as a communication event (an extralinguistically and socially conditioned form of communicative interaction) and a form of its speech (text) implementation. Since the term «quarrel» is not satisfactory for describing conflict interaction, it became possible to talk about genres of verbal aggression. The genre approach is intensively developed in the study of aggressive statements. Another effective approach to the study of communication is gender. Within the framework of gender linguistics, the concept of gender stereotype is actively studied, as well as the features of speech and non-speech behavior characteristic of men and women.Having considered the lexical features of the verbal behavior of Arnold Schwarzenegger and his initiators, a polemical discussion, it can be concluded that the corpus of obscene vocabulary is not so wide and is represented by derivatives of a narrow range of lexemes, mainly nouns and adjectives, as well as interjections and particles. For male initiators, polemical discussion is characterized by invective vocabulary aimed at the intellectual and volitional sphere of a person. For women initiators, a polemical discussion is typical of an invective directed at the moral sphere of a person. Gender invective is typical for both men and women initiators of a polemical discussion.The grammatical means exploited by the initiator, the polemic discussion in English-speaking non-cooperative communication, are typical of both Arnold Schwarzenegger and Arnold Schwarzenegger of verbal behavior and per-form mainly an emphatic, emotional-expressive and manipulative regulatory function.The stylistic means used by the author of the English-language literary text in describing the initiator's verbal behavior, polemical discussion, are very diverse. There is a diversity of phonographic means (dot, ellipsis, the use of written letters, italics, etc.). The speech of the female initiator of the polemical discussion, unlike Arnold Schwarzenegger of the initiator of the polemical discussion, is characterized by the use of metaphors and hyperboles and gradations.Arnold Schwarzenegger, acting as the initiator of the political discussion, is characterized by the tactics of threats against Arnold Schwarzenegger-the addressee. The threat is verbally explicated, and the initiator of a polemical discussion most often threatens the interlocutor with physical violence. The initiator of the polemical discussion threatens the interlocutor to blow up his shop and burn down the house. The threat has the following structure: «personal pronoun I + Future Simple». It is embodied in the text in exclamation sentences.The tactics of avoiding polemical discussion among male initiators, polemical discussion has two varieties: in some cases, Arnold Schwarzenegger tries to change the topic of conversation, and sometimes directly expresses his unwillingness to continue the conversation on this topic. It is also worth noting that the tactics of avoiding polemical discussion among male initiators of polemical discussion are implemented verbally.Another tactic characteristic of Arnold Schwarzenegger's behavior of the initiator of a polemical discussion is the tactic of imposing his point of view.The initiator of the polemical discussion does not want to go along with the address, but does not want to refuse directly. His unwillingness is evidenced by the speech represented by the verb of speaking to ask, modified by the adverb coldly. Invective tactics are exploited by the male initiator of the field discussion quite often. Invective tactics can be combined with self-presentation tactics and humiliation tactics to show their superiority over the addressee.Invective tactics can be combined with threat tactics. In this segment of the text, the initiator of the polemical discussion uses invective tactics. In both adverbial-nominal phrases ignorant chicken and honky faggots, both nominal kernels have the semantic meaning of a homo-sexual man (extremely offensive). The initiator of the polemic discussion threatens the interlocutors with physical violence. This is expressed both verbally and nonverbally. At the verbal level, the threat is represented by a special question The desire for physical punishment of the initiator of the polemical discussion is expressed by the phrase cut in the phrases to get cut, face cut open. The threat of the initiator of the polemical discussion is confirmed by panto-mimic components – movements of the hand and head, expressed by verbal phrases plunged his hand into the pocket, turned to face the people; and the phonation component represented by the verb of the sound action to snarl.So, typical for Arnold Schwarzenegger initiator of the polemic discussion are the following tactics: tactics of avoiding polemic discussion, which manifests itself verbally in changing the topic of conversation or outright refusal to continue the conversation; tactics of imposing a point of view; tactics of threat, the specifics of which are manifested in communicative actions, where Arnold Schwarzenegger is the addressee, as a threat of physical violence; invective tac-tics; tactics of humiliation; tactics of self-presentation.Non-cooperative communication can have a positive and negative conclusion. A positive conclusion means such a finale of non-cooperative interaction, where the vectors of the illocutionary forces of the initiator of the polemical discussion and the addressee coincide, i.e., they find a compromise.The negative end of non-cooperative interaction lies in the end of the episode of non-cooperative conversation with the opposite vectors of the illocutionary forces of the interlocutors, i.e., the initiator of the polemical discussion and the addressee did not come or did not seek consensus.The deployment of an explicit polemical discussion may proceed differently -communicative tactics will be successful, so that the result of non–cooperative communication may be positive. A positive result is achieved through tactics such as apologizing, abandoning one's point of view in favor of the interlocutor, manipulating the interlocutor, etc. Below are some examples of the positive conclusion of an ex-political polemic discussion: the addressee seeks to reach a consensus with the initiator of a polemical discussion; the initiator of a polemical discussion goes towards the addressee.So, an explicit polemical discussion can be resolved positively and negatively. A polemical discussion provides a positive conclusion to the desire of communicants for consensus, which can be achieved through the tactics of apology, persuasion and acceptance of someone else's point of view.Both participants of non-cooperative interaction (both the initiator of the polemic discussion and the addressee) can use these tactics. The polemical discussion ends negatively if the participants of the non-cooperative interaction do not go for rapprochement and are not set up for cooperation. In such a case, the initiator of a polemical discussion or the addressee may use the same tactics, but the interlocutor does not react to them. In the case of a negative conclusion of a polemical discussion, the most frequent tactic in the end is the tactic of interrupting contact.Observation of explicit polemical discussion has shown that the polemical cause of explicit polemical conflict in situations of non-cooperative communication are verbal and non-verbal components. When deploying a polemical discussion, Arnold Schwarzenegger and the women initiators of the polemical discussion use various tactics.The most typical masculine tactics of explicit political discussion are: tactics of threat, tactics of imposing one's point of view and tactics of avoiding polemical discussion by changing the topic of conversation. The women of the initiator of the polemical discussion are more likely to implement the tactics of ridicule, reproach and accusation. The conclusion of a polemical discussion situation can have both a negative and a positive vector.Observation of the implicit polemical discussion has shown that it is characterized by non-congruence and masking of the emotional state of communicants. A characteristic feature of implicit polemic discussion is the absence of aggression markers in the verbal behavior of communicants.Typical tactics of male initiators of a polemical discussion are tactics of suppression, threats and humiliation, the manifestation of which is observed in the nonverbal behavior of communicants. Arnold Schwarzenegger's behavior of the initiator of polemical discussion in situations of implicit polemical discussion is characterized by tactics of humiliation and demonstration of indifference, which are accompanied by specific non-verbal actions with artifacts. Implicit polemical discussion, as a rule, does not receive development.REFERENCES1. Akulova E.V. Genre «Announcement of acquaintance»: ethnocultural andgender specificity // Philology and man. Saratov, 2010. pp. 89 – 98.2. Apresyan V.Yu. Implicit aggression in language // Computer linguistics and intellectual technologies: proceedings of the internationalconference «Dialog 2003» M., 2003.3. Arnold I.V. Lexicology of modern English. M.:Flint, 2012. – 376 p.4. Arutyunova N.D. Genres of communication // Language and the human world. M., 1999 –pp.159-286.5. Arutyunova N.D. The addressee factor // // Izvestiya Academy of the USSR. Series of literature and language. M.: Nauka, 1981. – Vol. 40. No. 4. – pp. 356-367.6. Akhmadeeva K.N. Constructing gender stereotypes inmanagement: thematic repertoire of discursive practices and strategies:abstract. dis. on the job. learned. step. Candidate of Sciences. sociologist. sciences: spec. 22.00.08.Kazan, 2011. - 10 p. 7. Bazhenova I.S. Gender aspects of nonverbal communication // Society and gender. Ryazan: «Attorney», 2003. – pp.268-280.8. Bazhenova I.S. The pragmatic level of a literary text. Genresand types of text in scientific and media discourse // Mezhvuz. collection of scientific works. Issue 2. Orel: OGIIK, 2005. – pp.28-35.9. Bazhenova I.S. Emotions, pragmatics, text. M.: «Manager», 2003. – 392 p.10. Baranov A.N. Speech techniques of avoiding conflict in publiccommunication // Conflict in language and communication. Collection of articles. Moscow:RSUH, 2011. – pp.28-44.11. Baranov A.N., Dobrovolsky D.O. Linguistic conceptualization conflict // Conflict in language and communication. Collection of articles. Moscow: RSUH,2011. – pp.131-139.12. Bakhtin M.M. Problems of speech genres // Aesthetics of verbalcreativity. M., 197913. Belova E.V. Structural and content features of everydayconflict discourse: abstract. dis. on the job. learned. step. Candidate of Philological Sciencesspec.: 10.02.19. Tver, 2016. – 16 p.14. Belous N.A. Conflict discourse in the communicative space:semantic and pragmatic aspect: abstract. dis. on the job. learned. step. Doctor of Philology spec.: 10.02.19. Krasnodar, 2008. – 41 p.15. Bobodzhanova R.M. The role of the media in the formation of gender stereotypes. autoref. dis. on the job. learned. step. doct. philologist. sciences: spec. 10.01.10.Dushanbe, 2006. – 274 p.16. Bogdanov V.V. Classification of speech acts // Personal aspects language communication. Kalinin, 1989. – pp.25-37.17. Boeva E.D. Pragmatic parameters of nonverbalcommunication means: on the material of Russian, German and French languages andcultures: dis. on the job. learned. step. Candidate of Philological Sciences. Krasnodar, 2000. – 166p.18. Borisnev S.V. Sociology of communication. Moscow: UNITY-DANA, 2003.— 270 p.19. Borisova E.G. Amplifying particles as a conflict factor // Conflict in language and communication. Collection of articles. Moscow: RSUH, 2011. – pp.156-163.20. Borisova I. N. Russian conversational dialogue: structure and dynamics. Yekaterinburg, 2001. – 408 p.21. Bukin A.S. Non-cooperative dialogue (based on the material of Englishlanguage fiction): dis. on the job. learned. step. Candidate of Philological Sciencesspec.: 10.02.04. Orekhovo-Zuyevo, 2016. – 154 p.22. Buhler K. Theory of language. The representative function of language. M.:Progress, 1993. — 502 p.23. Vansyatskaya E.A. The role of nonverbal and verbal componentsof communication in texts reflecting human emotional reactions, andtheir correlation: on the material of the English language: dis. on the job. learned. step. Candidate of Philology: spec. 10.02.04. Ivanovo, 1999. – 161 p.24. Vansyatskaya E.A. Emotions in nonverbal behavior of children. (Based on the materialof English-language literary texts) / E. A. Vansyatskaya; FGBOU VPO«Ivanovo State University». Ivanovo: LISTOS, 2016. – 162p.25. Vansyatskaya E.A., Kartashkova F.I. Nonverbal componentsof communication in a literary text: on the material of the English language, Ivanovo, 2005.26. Vezhbitska A. Speech genres // Genres of speech: Collection of scientific articles. Saratov: College, 1997.27. Vechkina O.V. Communicative failures in speech communication: abstract. dis. on the job. learned. step. Candidate of Philological Sciences. spec.: 10.02.01. Saratov, 2010. –23 p.28. Voronina O.A. Formation of gender approach in socialsciences // Gender kaleidoscope. Course of lectures /Edited by M.M. Malysheva.M.: Academia, 2002. – pp. 8-33.29. Vryganova K.A. Linguistic representation of the phenomenon of maskinghuman emotions: on the material of English literary texts: dis. on the job. learned. step. Candidate of Philological Sciences spec.: 10.02.04, 10.02.19. Ivanovo, 2012. – 164 p.30. Vygotsky L.S. Psychology of human development. M.: Sense, Eksmo,2005. – 1136 p.31. Gavra D.P. Fundamentals of the theory of communication. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg, 2011. — 288 p.32. Ganina V.V. Nonverbal components of communication reflectingemotional reactions of a person: gender aspect. dis. on the job. stepen. Candidate of Philology, spec. 10.02.19 /Ganina V.V., Ivanovo, 2005. – 199 p.33. Ganina V.V., Kartashkova F.I. Human emotions and nonverbalbehavior. Gender aspect. // Ivanovo: Publishing house «IvanovoState University», 2006. – 208 p.34. Garanovich M.V. Variability of gender stereotypes dependingon the social parameters of speakers: dis. on the job. sci. step. Candidate of Sciences. philologist. sciences: spec. 10.02. 19. Pyatigorsk, 2011. – 272 p.35. Gindin S.I. Speech genres and language consciousness // Theses IX All-Union Symposium on Psycholinguistics and theory of communication. M.,1988.36. Glukhov V.P. Fundamentals of psycholinguistics. M.: ACT Astrel, 2005. — 351p.37. Golev N.D. Speech conflict in the aspect of the multiplicity of interpretationof speech works (based on the material of Russian game texts) // Genesis in language: collection of scientific papers on the 80th anniversary of V.I. Zelvis. Yaroslavl:YAGPU,2011.38. Golovanova I.A. Representation of nonverbal behavior in Russian andGerman literary texts: comparative aspect: dis. on the job. learned. step. Candidate of Philological Sciences. spec.: 10.02.20. Novosibirsk, 2009. – 205 p.39. Golovanova I.A. Representation of nonverbal behavior in Russian andGerman literary texts: comparative aspect: dis on the job. learned. step. Candidate of Philology / Golovanova I.A., Novosibirsk, 2009. – 205p41. Gorina E.V. Newspaper in the aspect of speech influence on personality: dis. on the job. sci. step. Candidate of Philology. sciences. Yekaterinburg, 2004. – 147 p.42. Gorodetsky B.Yu., Kobozeva I.M., Saburova I.G. To the typologyof communicative failures // Dialog interaction andknowledge representation. Novosibirsk, 1985.43. Goroshko E.I. Gender issues in linguistics // Introduction to gender studies. Part 1. In 2 hours: textbook. – Kharkiv: HCGI,St. Petersburg: Alteya, 2001. – 590 p.44. Goroshko E.I. Features of male and female writing style. Gender factor in language and communication. Ivanovo: IvSU, 1999. – 14 p.45. Grigoryan A.A. The state and prospects of gender linguistics in the The West at the end of the XIX- beginning of the XXI centuries: abstract. dis. on the job. learned. step. Doctor of Philology. spec: 10.02.19. Ivanovo, 2005. – 372 p.46. Gritsenko E.S. Gender in British and American linguistic cultures: monograph/E.S. Gritsenko, M.V. Sergeeva, A.O. Laletina, A.A. Bodrova, L.G.Dunyasheva; under the general editorship of E.S. Gritsenko. – Moscow: Flint: Nauka, 2011 – 224 p.47. Gritsenko E.S. Language. Gender. Discourse: monograph / E.S. Gritsenko. –Nizhny Novgorod: Publishing House of N.I. Lobachevsky National Research University, 2005. – 267 p.48. Grishaeva L.I. Gender and special language // Gender as an intrigueof cognition: Gender studies in linguistics, literary studies andcommunication theory, Moscow: Almanac, 2002. – p.5.49. Grushevitskaya T.G., Popkov V.D., Sadokhin A.P. Fundamentals of interculturalcommunication. Moscow: UNITY-DANA, 2003. – 352 p .50. Gulakova I.I. Communicative strategies and tactics of speechbehavior in a conflict situation of communication: dis. on the job. sci. step. Candidate of Sciences.philologist. sciences. Orel, 2004. – 152 p.51. Dadyan S.R. Representation of conflict communicativeinteraction in dialogues of artistic works // European Social Science Journal («European Journal of Social Sciences»). Riga-Moscow,2011. – pp.153-161.52. Danilina L.Y. Linguopragmatic features of communicative acts of disagreement in dialogic discourse (based on the material of English andRussian): autoref. on the job. learned. step. Candidate of Philological Sciences. Moscow,2011. – 20 p.53. Dementiev V.V. Genre structure of phatic communication: autoref. dis. on the job. learned. step. Candidate of Philological Sciences. Saratov, 1995. – 19 p.54. Dementiev V.V. Theory of speech genres. Moscow: Znak, 2010. – 597 p.55. Lavrenko, E. V. Tactics of implementation of incentive strategy in informa-tional economic discourse / E. V. Lavrenko // Materials of the annual scientific conference of teachers and graduate students of the University / ed.: A.V. Zubov [et al.]. – M. : MGLU, 2006. – pp. 15-22.56. Petrova V. A. The idea of spirituality: Western European and Russian contexts // Culture on the protection of childhood. Abstracts of the V International Conference «The Child in the modern world: the rights of the child». St. Petersburg, May 27 - 29, 1998 - St. Petersburg: RHGI, 1998. - pp. 63-65 (0.2 pp.).57. Petrova V. A At the turn: the right of childhood to the problem // Childhood and society. Philosophical and cultural aspects. Abstracts of the VI International Conference «The Child in the Modern World: Open Society and childhood». St. Petersburg, 21-2 April 3, 1999 - St. Petersburg: Publishing House of the Russian Academy of Sciences - SPbSTU, 1999. - pp. 69-70 (OD L.L.).58. Petrova V.A. Society as a family (national aesthetic model) // Russian philosophy of childhood. Abstracts of the VIII International Conference «The Child in the modern world: the Fatherland and children». St. Petersburg, 2001 - St. Petersburg: Publishing House of St. Petersburg State Technical University, 2001. - pp. 183-187 (0.3 pp.).59. Petrova V.A. Dispute about the family // Meanings of myth: mythology in history and culture: A collection of conference materials. - St. Petersburg: Publishing house of St. Petersburg. philos. obva, 2001. - pp. 283 - 285 (0.2 pp. l.).60. Petrova V.A. On two models of dialogue in education // Dialogues in education: A collection of conference materials. - St. Petersburg: Publishing house of St. Petersburg. philos. obva, 2002. - pp. 95-97 (0.2 pp. l.).61. Petrova V.A. From the history of the Russian polemical tradition («The Rod of government...» by Simeon Polotsky: the experience of complex analysis) // Strategies of interaction of philosophy, cultural studies and public communications. Materials of the All-Russian conference dedicated to the 10th anniversary of the Faculty of Human Philosophy of A.I. Herzen RSPU. St. Petersburg, November 28 - 29, 2003 - St. Petersburg: Publishing House of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2003. - p. 566 -573 (0.5 p.l.).62. Petrova V.A. «The rod of my rage ...»: the creative image of the author and the imaginary opponent in the polemical text of the XVII century // Creation – creativity - reproduction: philosophical and religious experience. International readings on the theory, history and philosophy of culture. - Issue 15. - St. Petersburg: Eidos, 2003. - pp. 296 - 306 (0,75 p.l.).63. Sazhina, E. V. Structural and pragmatic characteristics of polemical discourse (based on the material of the English-language press) : dis. ... Candidate of Philology : 10.02.04 / E. V. Sazhina ; Minsk. gos. linguistich. un-T. –Minsk, 2007. – 132 l.64. International debate education association [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://idebate.org/.65. International debate education association: politics [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://idebate.org/debatabase/themes/politics.66. International debate education association: education [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://idebate.org/debatabase/themes/education.67. International debate education association: culture [Electronic resource]. – Access mode:http://idebate.org/debatabase/themes/culture.68. International debate education association: religion [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://idebate.org/debatabase/themes/religion.69. International debate education association: sport [Electronic resource]. – Access mode:http://idebate.org/debatabase/themes/sport.70. International debate education association: economy [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://idebate.org/debatabase/themes/economy.71. Schwarzenegger | Exclusive Ladder Interview[Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bA_2AgU05L472. Schwarzenegger LIVE Full at 21st Century Education, Sydney[Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NgRuULUql0E73. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s Speaks to the 6th Annual Austrian World Summit [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X0vyLpeH37Y74. Arnold Schwarzenegger calls leaders 'liars' over climate change - BBC News [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wpy4xBftFuY75. Arnold Schwarzenegger calls Trump 'worst president' ever, 'failed leader' after Capitol riot | ABC7 [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAWvl-g_6rg76. Shenli Song. Metaphor and Metonymy—A Tentative Researchinto Modern Cognitive Linguistics. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 68-73, January 2011. 77. Annelie Ädel. Metonymy in the semantic field of verbal communication: A corpus-based analysis of WORD. Journal of Pragmatics 67:72–88. Dalarna University, 2014. 78. Jialing Guan. The Cognitive Nature of Metonymy and Its Implications for English Vocabulary Teaching. China University of Mining and Technology. Xuzhou, 2014. 79. William Dezheng Feng. Metonymy and Visual Representation: Towards A Social Semiotic Framework of Visual Metonymy. The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, 2016. 80. Dunstan Brown, Greville Corbett, Marina Chumakina, Geri Popova. Defining 'periphrasis': Key notions Article  in  Morphology. May 2012. : https://www.researchgate.net/publication/25769283081. Pritty Patel-Grosz. Epithets as De Re Pronouns. University of Tübingen, 2017. 82. Noura Aljadaan. Understanding Hyperbole. Arab World English Journal (October, 2018). 33 p.83. Burgers, C., Brugman, B. C., Renardel de Lavalette, K. Y., & Steen, G. J. (2016). HIP: A Method for Linguistic Hyperbole Identification in Discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 31(3), 163- 178. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2016.118704184. Kristine Harutyunyan, Hayk Danielyan. The Use of Emotionally Colored Words in English E-Headlines. Armenian Folia Anglistika. Yerevan, 2016. 88 p. 85. Kirsten Weber,Morten H. Christiansen,Karl Magnus Petersson, Peter Indefrey, Peter Hagoort. Syntactic and Lexical Repetition Effects Reveal the Initial Stages of Learning a New Language. The Journal of Neuroscience, June 29, 2016. 86. Yetian Wang, Randy Allen Harris and Daniel M. Berry. An Ontology for Ploke: Rhetorical Figures of Lexical Repetitions. University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave. W., Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. 16 p. 87. Adorján Mária. Lexical Repetition in Academic Discourse A Computer-aided Study of the Text Organizing Role of Repetition. Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, 2015. 21 p. 88. Qingshun He. Implications of Lexical Repetition Patterns for Language Teaching. International Journal of Linguistics ISSN 1948-5425 2014, Vol. 6, No. 4. P.46-58. 89. Nino Kemertelidze, Tamar Manjavidze. Stylistic repetition, its peculiarities and types in modern English// European Scientific Journal July 2013 /SPECIAL/ edition ISSN: 1857 – 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 743190. Claudia Claridge. Hyperbole in English: A corpus-based study of exaggeration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2011. P. 140-144. 91. Robyn Carston. Metaphor, hyperbole and simile: A pragmatic approach. Article  in  Language and Cognition · March 2014. P. 283 – 312. 92. Douglas Biber, Edward Finrgan. Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Interdisciplinary journal for the Study of Discourse. November, 2009. P. 93 – 124.